[Python-Dev] Re: RELEASED Python 2.3.1 (original) (raw)
Martin v. Löwis martin at v.loewis.de
Sat Sep 27 06:30:53 EDT 2003
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: RELEASED Python 2.3.1
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: RELEASED Python 2.3.1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Jason R. Mastaler" <jason at mastaler.com> writes:
> I don't think the problem is severe; os.fsync is rarely used.
How did you arrive at this notion?
From four considerations:
- It did not show up in any of the tests.
- To use it, you have to use "bare" file descriptors; this is relatively un-pythonic.
- To use it, you have to worry about data getting on the disk - this really requires some kind of expert application.
- It is not universally available, so the expert application I had to assume in 3) would most likely test for presence of fsync, and fall back to just not use it (and perhaps invoke sync(1) instead).
Regards, Martin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: RELEASED Python 2.3.1
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: RELEASED Python 2.3.1
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]