[Python-Dev] Possible modules that could use docs (original) (raw)

Brett C. bac at OCF.Berkeley.EDU
Mon Apr 19 02:56:34 EDT 2004

Discovering the 'opcode' module thanks to the new PEP 329 caused me to wonder how many modules are undocumented and yet deserve to possibly be (I also was procrastinating from doing schoolwork and felt like doing some light coding =).

Below is a list of modules that might deserve some docs. Any with numbers by them mean that a bug report has been filed to have them documented.

If any of the modules below should not be documented, please speak up (especially about the ones with SF bug reports since those could then be closed; but they seem like modules that should get some docs). Otherwise I would like to at least mention this list in the next python-dev Summary in hopes someone will want to step forward and document them. I would also like to file a bug report for each one that doesn't have one yet so it at least gets recorded somewhere which modules still need docs beyond just the mailing list archives.

DocXMLRPCServer.py ihooks.py imputil.py 515751 modulefinder.py 914375 opcode.py pickletools.py smtpd.py 450803 symtable.py toaiff.py trace.py 779976 737734 clmodule.c puremodule.c symtablemodule.c 896052 timingmodule.c zipimport.c imp (built-in)

-Brett

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list