[Python-Dev] Re: Proposal: A more powerful alternative to ConfigParser (original) (raw)

David Goodger goodger at python.org
Thu Apr 22 08:53:36 EDT 2004

[Full text included for the benefit of python-dev]

Dan Gass wrote:

I have written a new module 'config.py' which can be used for similar purposes as ConfigParser. The biggest difference is that this fetches user configured python objects. The technique this module supports is well thought out and provides a single solution for the simplest to the most complex configuration problems without sacrificing ease of use and simplicity. For these reasons I think it should be considered for inclusion into the Python distribution. I work in the field of embedded software development and find this module extremely useful for unit, integration, and functional testing of our software as well as for controlling many other utility scripts.

To date I have:

  1. provided documentation in the module doc string
  2. insured made sure module is well commented and follows the coding guidelines
  3. written a test suite to insure functionality is correct (and remains correct)

I am willing to do further development of this module, support of the module and take the steps necessary to see it through the PEP process. I am looking for feedback on whether this module should be considered for inclusion in the standard Python distribution as well as any technical suggestions. I have placed the GNU license on the module but would be more than happy (and legally able) to relabel it with the license of your choice.

Thanks in advance for your consideration!

Dan Gass

Hi Dan,

Thanks for your interest. I'm not sure why, but your message (sent April 21 around 15:40 UTC) didn't make it to the python-dev list as addressed.

Typically, a new module first has to prove itself in the real world before being accepted into the standard library, especially for a module replacing existing functionality. It's usually easier to accept additions/improvements to existing modules (i.e. patches) than replacement modules.

I suggest you put the module (along with docs and the test suite) up on the web and make an announcement on python-announce. Then try to generate community support.

In any case, if you'd like to write a PEP for it, please read through PEP 1 and PEP 2.

-- David Goodger <http://starship.python.net/~goodger> Python Enhancement Proposal (PEP) Editor <http://www.python.org/peps/>

(Please cc: all PEP correspondence to <peps at python.org>.)

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list