[Python-Dev] Re: 2.4a2, and @decorators (original) (raw)
Jim Fulton jim at zope.com
Wed Aug 4 15:46:55 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: 2.4a2, and @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: 2.4a2, and @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Terry Reedy wrote:
...
Decorators will add complexity, regardless of syntax.
Especially in their current over-powered form. If decorators didn't have to take arguments, then you could use a syntax like:
def classmethod foo(cls, ...): ...
This does add complexity, but I think it enhances understandability.
I understand why some people want to be able to pass arguments to decorators, but frankly, I find many of the examples of doing so down right scary.
An advantage of the @ syntax is than it makes the complexiity separable and ignorable for someone learning/teaching basic Python,
I don't agree that they are ignorable. People will see them in code and will have to understand what they mean. Given sme examples I've seen here, this will sometimes be a significant chalenge.
Jim
-- Jim Fulton mailto:jim at zope.com Python Powered! CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: 2.4a2, and @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: 2.4a2, and @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]