[Python-Dev] Questions about '@' in pep 318 (original) (raw)
Edward K. Ream edreamleo at charter.net
Fri Aug 6 00:16:33 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Questions about '@' in pep 318
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Questions about '@' in pep 318
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
That requires all annotations to be in the future module. This is not acceptable, as there is a desire to provide user-defined annotations as well.
Oh dear. Does this mean that @x is a potential annotation for any identifier x? This would be very bad for Leo.
I was using future by way of explanation. I do hope namespaces could somehow denote annotations. My off-the-cuff suggestion was for pseudo-modules, so maybe the normal module rules could be sidestepped?
Edward
Edward K. Ream email: edreamleo at charter.net Leo: Literate Editor with Outlines Leo: http://webpages.charter.net/edreamleo/front.html
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Questions about '@' in pep 318
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Questions about '@' in pep 318
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]