[Python-Dev] Call for defense of @decorators (original) (raw)

Edward K. Ream edreamleo at charter.net
Fri Aug 6 00:19:29 CEST 2004

Or you could argue on a procedural basis: regardless of whether the feature is good or bad, the current implementation is unacceptable, as the PEP does not correspond with the implementation, the syntax is undocumented, the code has no test cases, and so on. I'm actually going to do that, because I do think the process is unacceptable, and should be either corrected or reversed (of course, this says nothing about the feature itself, or the code implementing it).

Thank you, Martin. I think Python will be the better for holding itself to higher standards.

Edward

Edward K. Ream email: edreamleo at charter.net Leo: Literate Editor with Outlines Leo: http://webpages.charter.net/edreamleo/front.html

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list