[Python-Dev] Call for defense of @decorators (original) (raw)
Barry Warsaw barry at python.org
Fri Aug 6 00:25:17 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 17:53, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
- There are two obvious usage cases for decorators: static and class methods;
- There are more complex usage cases for decorators such as PyObjC which was already agreed to be something necessarily supported in the implementation;
I'm not sure these two points are accurate. There's definitely a large middle ground between staticmethod/classmethod and PyObjC's use cases.
- People which want the powerful decorators don't care about the syntax, as far as the feature is implemented;
I care deeply about the syntax, but I can accept any of the choices that have made Guido's final cut.
-Barry
-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20040805/8380bfdb/attachment.pgp
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]