[Python-Dev] A usability argument for list-after-def (original) (raw)
Kendall Clark krunkle at gmail.com
Fri Aug 6 16:56:23 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] A usability argument for list-after-def
- Next message: [Python-Dev] A usability argument for list-after-def
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 14:35:08 +1200, Greg Ewing <greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
"Phillip J. Eby" <pje at telecommunity.com>:
> Now, I don't know if my thought process here is at all typical or > representative of anything, other than my own idiosyncratic self. You're not alone. I agree with everything you said there.
+1
Eby's is the best argument I've heard so far. I favor list-after-def over @ for decorator syntax -- FWIW. List after def seems very unambiguously some kind of modifier of a function or method.
Kendall Grant Clark Managing Editor, XML.com
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] A usability argument for list-after-def
- Next message: [Python-Dev] A usability argument for list-after-def
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]