[Python-Dev] Suggesting '.' decorators (PEP318) (original) (raw)
Raymond Hettinger python at rcn.com
Sat Aug 7 03:31:19 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Suggesting '.' decorators (PEP318)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Suggesting '.' decorators (PEP318)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I haven't seen this mentioned, so I'm going to throw in my suggestion. > > The following makes sense to me, uses previously invalid syntax, and > uses the '.' punctuation in a way similar to existing/proposed usage:
-1. This violates my "syntax should not look like grit" rule.
Also, the dot prefix should probably be kept free in case a WITH statement is ever introduced.
Raymond
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Suggesting '.' decorators (PEP318)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Suggesting '.' decorators (PEP318)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]