[Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators (original) (raw)

Anthony Baxter anthony at interlink.com.au
Sun Aug 8 13:52:49 CEST 2004

Roman Suzi wrote:

On Sat, 7 Aug 2004, [ISO-8859-1] "Martin v. L?wis" wrote:

But must it be "@", such an eye-catching, ugly piece of flie-dirt? If you don't like the current proposal, try to find objective reasons, in addition to the subjective ones. Also, try to come up with counter-proposals that are well thought-out, instead of being created in a rush. In particular, if all you are concerned with is the specific choice of operator, propose a different one. BTW, hat is wrong with my %-proposal: def foo(self) % decor(): body

Guido has already ruled out the decorators-after-function-arguments form. See the last week's archives for python-dev - thread subject was "def fn (args) [dec,dec]:"

-- Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> It's never too late to have a happy childhood.

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list