[Python-Dev] new failing test -- test_compiler (original) (raw)
Jeremy Hylton jhylton at gmail.com
Sun Aug 8 16:26:33 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] new failing test -- test_compiler
- Next message: [Python-Dev] new failing test -- test_compiler
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 20:35:44 -0400, Tim Peters <tim.peters at gmail.com> wrote:
[Armin Rigo] > ... > This is now fixed by skipping the optimization if we got an interned string. > While messing with obrefcnt is always a bit fragile I am still convinced that > the += optimization is safe again.
Ya, this bug wasn't scary (an unlikely but clear-in-hindsight problem, specifically due to a subsystem lying about true refcounts -- not much of that goes on, thank God). Alas, testcompiler still fails (but in an ordinary "doesn't work" way, no longer in an internal-error way), so testing with -uall is still a bit broken.
I won't be able to fix it today, but I'll get on that asap.
Jeremy
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] new failing test -- test_compiler
- Next message: [Python-Dev] new failing test -- test_compiler
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]