[Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators (original) (raw)
Roman Suzi rnd at onego.ru
Fri Aug 13 19:04:34 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Nick Coghlan wrote:
predef staticmethod predef author(name='yarrB') predef returns([int]) def plugh(self): return 42
To me, 'predef' seems to shout "Look, I'm telling you something about the 'def' that you are about to encounter in a line or two."
This is too much repetition to please programmers ;) They like to write things ONCE. This is exactly the reason why all this decorator hell raised:
def X: ... X = decor(X)
uses X three times...
Ah well, guess I'll go back to being a lurker on the deco issue. . . >Cheers, Nick. > Sincerely yours, Roman Suzi
rnd at onego.ru == My AI powered by GNU/Linux RedHat 7.3
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Re: Call for defense of @decorators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]