[Python-Dev] Deprecated xmllib module (original) (raw)

Barry Warsaw barry at python.org
Mon Dec 6 02:10:28 CET 2004

On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 18:49, Brett C. wrote:

And as for the mention of dropping PEP 4, I agree with the running consensus that it isn't needed thanks to the warning module. Do we need to have a more formal vote to drop PEP 4, or should one the PEP maintainers just delete it?

There's really no such thing as "dropping" a PEP, but in any event, we should still keep PEP 4 to document the procedure for deprecating modules. It just doesn't need to list any modules (i.e. remove the sections labeled Obsolete modules, Deprecated modules, and Undeprecated modules).

-Barry

-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20041205/c1ad06b4/attachment.pgp

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list