[Python-Dev] Re: Plea for function/method syntax sugar (PEP 318, with a different syntax) (original) (raw)
Bob Ippolito bob at redivi.com
Thu Feb 19 12:24:06 EST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Plea for function/method syntax sugar (PEP 318, with a different syntax)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Plea for function/method syntax sugar (PEP 318, with a different syntax)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Feb 19, 2004, at 12:06 PM, Michael Hudson wrote:
Bob Ippolito <bob at redivi.com> writes:
Also note that the patch also adds the same sugar to classes, so you could use it in lieu of metaclasses for some cases (like transforming some members that follow a naming convention into properties):
class Foo(object) [type]: ... pass ... Foo <type 'type'> FWIW, I'm rather less convinced this is useful.
Me too, because you can do it with metaclasses... but then again, composing metaclasses is a pain in the butt.
-bob
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Plea for function/method syntax sugar (PEP 318, with a different syntax)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Plea for function/method syntax sugar (PEP 318, with a different syntax)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]