[Python-Dev] Re: new syntax for wrapping (PEP 318) (original) (raw)
Michael Hudson mwh at python.net
Fri Feb 27 06:40:03 EST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: new syntax for wrapping (PEP 318)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: new syntax for wrapping (PEP 318)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Delaney, Timothy C (Timothy)" <tdelaney at avaya.com> writes:
Anyway, those are my thoughts on the whole topic. I'm:
Nice work.
+1 on syntax for decorators attached to function definitions +1 on def foo (bar) [baz]: +0 on def foo (bar) as baz: if there's a way to extend it multi-line. -1 on all the other proposed syntaxes. -1 on restricting it to specific decorators such as classmethod
I agree, FWIW.
Cheers, mwh
-- Gullible editorial staff continues to post links to any and all articles that vaguely criticize Linux in any way. -- Reason #4 for quitting slashdot today, from http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/klee/misc/slashdot.html
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: new syntax for wrapping (PEP 318)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: new syntax for wrapping (PEP 318)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]