[Python-Dev] PEP 318 - function/method/class decoration (original) (raw)
Bernhard Herzog bh at intevation.de
Sat Mar 6 12:42:40 EST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 318 - function/method/class decoration
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 318 - function/method/class decoration
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bob Ippolito <bob at redivi.com> writes:
On Mar 6, 2004, at 12:17 PM, Bernhard Herzog wrote:
Bob Ippolito <bob at redivi.com> writes:
This proposed new syntax is:
funcdef: 'def' NAME parameters ['[' exprlist ']' ] ':' suite classdef: 'class' NAME ['(' testlist ')'] ['[' exprlist ']'] ':' suite Why are the decorators an exprlist while the base classes are a testlist? The testlist is the list of base classes.. In both cases, the decorators are an '[' exprlist ']'
That much was obvious enough :). What I meant was: Why are the decorators an exprlist and not a testlist? The base classes are a test list and the elements of a list-literal that (listmaker in Grammar) are effectively a testlist too, so it's not obvious why the decorators should not also be a testlist.
Bernhard
-- Intevation GmbH http://intevation.de/ Skencil http://sketch.sourceforge.net/ Thuban http://thuban.intevation.org/
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 318 - function/method/class decoration
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 318 - function/method/class decoration
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]