[Python-Dev] Possible resolution of generatorexpressionvariablecapture dilemma (original) (raw)
Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Thu Mar 25 19:01:38 EST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Possible resolution of generatorexpressionvariablecapture dilemma
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Possible resolution of generator expressionvariablecapture dilemma
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
With regard to generator expressions, isn't Guido leaning back towards not having any variable capture?
Right.
Or is he un-leaning-back again? This is all getting very confusing...
Paul Dubois told me he thought that an example I used in my keynote today (which would fail without capture) would be an attractive nuisance for scientists (since it looked just like a reasonable way to compute an outer product). I'm not sure the argument holds, because an outer product would typically be created as a list of lists, not a list of generators.
The example I used was:
F = [] for i in range(10): F.append(x*i for x in range(10))
It would end up creating 10 generators referencing the variable i with value 9.
The version using list comprehensions of course works:
F = [] for i in range(10): F.append([x*i for x in range(10)])
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Possible resolution of generatorexpressionvariablecapture dilemma
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Possible resolution of generator expressionvariablecapture dilemma
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]