[Python-Dev] method decorators (PEP 318) (original) (raw)
Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Fri Mar 26 13:47:04 EST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] method decorators (PEP 318)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] method decorators (PEP 318)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
It appears to be a surprisingly important detail.
I'm anal about trying to find the optimal syntax given incompatible constraints.
Tossing out another idea:
foobar: author = "Guido van Rossum" deprecated = True def foobar(self, arg): pass The declaration block must be followed immediately by a class or def statement. It looks elegant to me.
The current parser can't deal with "NAME ':'" as a syntax rule, because expressions also start with NAME.
I also don't like that you have to repeat the function name.
And this would hide the "important" decorators (e.g. classmethod) amongst a large collection of metadata (unless you want to combine this with the "def foo [classmethod] (cls, a, b, c):" syntax.
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] method decorators (PEP 318)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] method decorators (PEP 318)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]