[Python-Dev] Stackless Python (original) (raw)

Shane Holloway (IEEE) shane.holloway at ieee.org
Mon May 31 13:34:19 EDT 2004

Does this mean that the implementation of Stackless 3.0 could be acceptable to integrate into CPython 2.5? It would be absolutely wonderful to have those capabilities available in the standard distribution!

-Shane Holloway

Martin v. Löwis wrote:

Eyal Lotem wrote: > Why is Python still not stackless?

But it is: http://www.stackless.com/ If you are asking: Why is python.org Python still not stackless? then I think the answer has varied over time. The most recent answer is that no volunteer has stepped forward to make Python stackless. That, in turn, likely hasn't happened because it is hard to do, and because nobody has seen any reason to do so as you could always use Stackless Python. Regards, Martin

Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/shane.holloway%40ieee.org

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list