[Python-Dev] Re: Re: Missing arguments in RE functions (original) (raw)

Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettinger at verizon.net
Wed Sep 8 20:16:26 CEST 2004

> If you see a downside, feel free to reject his patch. IMO, it is only a > small win.

If it's up to me, it's a clear "not worth it". The function API is only there for trivial cases; if you need the full RE power, use pattern objects (you have to use them anyway if you're serious about RE:s). but I'm an API minimalist; someone else will have to make the final decision on this one (Guido, what's your take on API size issues?)

It is up to you. You're still the god of re (among other things).

FWIW, I gave extra weight to the OP's usability enhancement request because it was born out of experience teaching Python to newbies. The patch itself is a little rough and needs refinement.

Raymond

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list