[Python-Dev] Re: Re: Alternative Implementation for PEP292:SimpleString Substitutions (original) (raw)
Fredrik Lundh fredrik at pythonware.com
Tue Sep 14 10:33:03 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Re: Alternative Implementation for PEP 292:SimpleString Substitutions
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Re: Alternative Implementation for PEP 292:SimpleString Substitutions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Terry Reedy wrote:
usually shorter in languages with many ideographs (my non-scientific tests indicate that chinese text uses about 4 times less symbols than english; I'm sure someone can dig up better figures). This is why I am not especially enamored of Unicode and the prospect of Python becoming married to it. It is heavily weighted in favor of efficiently representing Chinese and inefficiently representing English.
Don't confuse Unicode with its UCS-2 and UCS-4 encodings. On a conceptual level, good old 7-bit ASCII and 8-bit ISO-Latin-1 are both Unicode.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: Re: Alternative Implementation for PEP 292:SimpleString Substitutions
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: Re: Alternative Implementation for PEP 292:SimpleString Substitutions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]