[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 292: method names (original) (raw)
Aahz aahz at pythoncraft.com
Tue Sep 14 21:04:36 CEST 2004
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 292: method names
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 292: method names
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004, Brett C. wrote:
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
Brett C wrote:
I am sure the way I tend to abbreviate things is not how anyone else would. So why would the stdlib try to? it's pretty amazing that you've been able to use Python without noticing that the standard library is full of abbreviations. Just because the stdlib is full of abbreviations does not mean it should be continued. Precedence != acceptance .
What I find interesting about your responses is that you're using the abbreviation "stdlib", assuming that your audience will understand that easily enough.
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines." --Ralph Waldo Emerson
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 292: method names
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: PEP 292: method names
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]