[Python-Dev] deque alternative (was: Linked lists) (original) (raw)
Josiah Carlson jcarlson at uci.edu
Mon Dec 26 05:54:42 CET 2005
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] deque alternative (was: Linked lists)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] deque alternative (was: Linked lists)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Peters <tim.peters at gmail.com> wrote:
Like Phillip Eby, I use 2-tuples for this when I feel the need (usually during a backtracking graph search, to keep track of paths back to the root in a space-efficient way), and am happy with that.
Then there's the whole Python list with append() and pop(). It takes a method resolution and function call, but at least in Python 2.3, it is a hair faster...
- Josiah
if 1: ... t = time.time() ... a = tuple() ... for i in xrange(1000000): ... a = (i, a) ... for i in xrange(1000000): ... i,a = a ... print time.time()-t ... 3.28500008583 if 1: ... t = time.time() ... a = [] ... for i in xrange(1000000): ... a.append(i) ... for i in xrange(1000000): ... i = a.pop() ... print time.time()-t ... 3.02399992943
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] deque alternative (was: Linked lists)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] deque alternative (was: Linked lists)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]