[Python-Dev] Let's get rid of unbound methods (original) (raw)
Jim Fulton jim at zope.com
Tue Jan 4 20:12:39 CET 2005
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Let's get rid of unbound methods
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Let's get rid of unbound methods
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
At 10:28 AM 1/4/05 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Of course, more changes would be needed: docs, the test suite, and some simplifications to the instance method object implementation in classobject.c.
Does anyone think this is a bad idea? Code that currently does 'aClass.aMethod.imfunc' in order to access the function object would break, as would code that inspects 'imself' to determine whether a method is a class or instance method. (Although code of the latter sort would already break with static methods, I suppose.)
Code of the latter sort wouldn't break with the change. We'd still have bound methods.
Jim
-- Jim Fulton mailto:jim at zope.com Python Powered! CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Let's get rid of unbound methods
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Let's get rid of unbound methods
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]