[Python-Dev] LinkedHashSet/LinkedHashMap equivalents (original) (raw)
Raymond Hettinger python at rcn.com
Thu Mar 10 04:21:18 CET 2005
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] LinkedHashSet/LinkedHashMap equivalents
- Next message: [Python-Dev] LinkedHashSet/LinkedHashMap equivalents
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[Aahz]
Gee, I just found out I could have used an OrderedDict today. (We're using a dict that we're now having to add an auxilliary list to to track when keys are added.) (This isn't particularly an argument in favor of adding OrderedDict to stdlib, but it's another use case. Each dict key contains a dict value; the subkeys from later-added keys are supposed to override earlier subkeys. The original implementation relied on subkeys being unique, but that doesn't work for our new business requirements.)
If I read the proposal correctly, order would be determined by when the key was first encountered. Presumably, that would mean that the related value would also be the first encountered (not overridden by later-added keys as dictated by your business requirements).
Raymond
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] LinkedHashSet/LinkedHashMap equivalents
- Next message: [Python-Dev] LinkedHashSet/LinkedHashMap equivalents
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]