[Python-Dev] dis module and new-style classes (original) (raw)
Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Thu Apr 6 19:47:44 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] dis module and new-style classes
- Next message: [Python-Dev] dis module and new-style classes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I think it's fine as it is. I don't think making it walk the inheritance tree is helpful; the output would be too large. Also, an instance doesn't have any code and that's fine too.
(Didn't you mean "dis.dis(D) doesn't touch C"?)
--Guido
On 4/6/06, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote:
Hi,
dis.dis currently handles new-style classes stepmotherly: given class C(object): def Cm(): pass class D(object): def Dm(): pass dis.dis(C) doesn't touch D, and dis.dis(C()) doesn't touch anything. Should it be fixed? It may need some reworking in dis.dis. Georg
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
-- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] dis module and new-style classes
- Next message: [Python-Dev] dis module and new-style classes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]