[Python-Dev] int vs ssize_t in unicode (original) (raw)
"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Thu Apr 13 08:37:49 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] int vs ssize_t in unicode
- Next message: [Python-Dev] int vs ssize_t in unicode
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Neal Norwitz wrote:
In Include/ucnhash.h I notice some integers and wonder if those should be Pyssizet. It looks like they are just names so they should be pretty short.
Right: int size is below 100; the name length of a Unicode character is below 40 (I believe). OTOH, changing them to Py_ssize_t wouldn't hurt, either.
235: assert(length<INTMAX);_ _unicode->length = (int)length;
Right: I just changed it. It may date back to a version of the patch where I only changed the signatures of the functions, but not the object layout.
376, 404: int i;
Right, changed.
1366: (seems like this could be a 64-bit value) int nneeded;
Right; also, the safe downcast can go away.
(i stopped at this point, there are probably more)
I looked through the entire file, and fixed all I could find.
Modules/unicodedata.c (lots of ints, not sure if they are a problem)
Most of them are not, since most functions deal only with Unicode characters, character names, and character numbers (which are below 2**21).
494: isize = PyUnicodeGETSIZE(input);
This is a problem, though; I fixed it.
Regards, Martin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] int vs ssize_t in unicode
- Next message: [Python-Dev] int vs ssize_t in unicode
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]