[Python-Dev] magic in setuptools (Was: setuptools in the stdlib) (original) (raw)
"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Thu Apr 20 22:59:21 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] windows buildbot failures
- Next message: [Python-Dev] magic in setuptools (Was: setuptools in the stdlib)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bob Ippolito wrote:
They DO NOT compete any more than source packages do. eggs are packages plus metadata, nothing more. What eggs do and what rpm/msi/deb does are orthogonal. It's entirely reasonable that in the future rpm/msi/deb will simply be a delivery mechanism for eggs.
That might be your view, but it apparently isn't the view of the inventor(s). From
http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/setuptools
Create Python Eggs - a single-file importable distribution format
http://peak.telecommunity.com/DevCenter/PythonEggs
'"Eggs are to Pythons as Jars are to Java..."'
'There are several binary formats that embody eggs, but the most common is '.egg' zipfile format, because it's a convenient one for distributing projects.'
'.egg files are a "zero installation" format for a Python package;'
So the .egg inventors do view .egg files (i.e. the .egg zipfile format) as a distribution format, just like rpm/msi/deb are distribution formats (none of them "zero installation", though, you always have to perform some deployment activity).
Regards, Martin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] windows buildbot failures
- Next message: [Python-Dev] magic in setuptools (Was: setuptools in the stdlib)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]