[Python-Dev] openSSL and windows binaries (original) (raw)
"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Wed Aug 9 09:16:19 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] openSSL and windows binaries - license
- Next message: [Python-Dev] openSSL and windows binaries - license
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gregory P. Smith schrieb:
disabling/enabling a cipher in openssl that isn't commonly used and isn't even directly exposed via any API to a python user hardly sounds like dropping a feature to me.
Strictly speaking, it is dropping a feature: a connection that can get established with 2.5b3 might not get established with 2.5c1, assuming a server that requires some IDEA-based cipher.
(any sane SSL connection will negotiate AES or 3DES as its cipher; IDEA isn't required)
Ok, I'll believe you that there isn't a practical risk associated with dropping that algorithm; I'll see what I can do.
If the release manager declares, "absolutely no changes to the windows build process!"
He didn't declare that: bug fixes are always possible. He declared "absolutely no new features without explicit permission".
Then clearly none of the changes I submitted will make it in and neither would removing any hint of IDEA in 2.5 as they're both too late.
Those changes still need permission, as they constitute a new feature.
yeah i'd just do that if you're worried about the code being in the binary causing a problem.
See, my own worries come from the "if". Should I risk breaking somebody's application just because somebody else is worried about breaking patents? You haven't indicated whether you also worry: do you?
Regards, Martin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] openSSL and windows binaries - license
- Next message: [Python-Dev] openSSL and windows binaries - license
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]