[Python-Dev] Let's just keep lambda (original) (raw)
Bengt Richter bokr at oz.net
Fri Feb 10 02:09:18 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Let's just *keep* lambda
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Let's just *keep* lambda
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 01:23:25 +0100, Thomas Wouters <thomas at xs4all.net> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 12:16:30AM +0000, Bengt Richter wrote:
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 10:33:10 -0800, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: >Enough already. [...some stuff snipped...] Yes, but if you're an optimist, those years mean we're closer to the magic moment ;-) [...some stuff snipped...] Please stop. Discuss it elsewhere. I suggest not CC'ing Guido in that discussion, either, at least not if you want the proposals to still have a chance. Also don't CC me, please, although it's not as hazardous as pissing off Guido ;) Well, he presented a technical problem (indentation for lambda suites), and my main point was to address it with a suggestion he may not have seen (or why wouldn't he have mentioned it at least as a dumb failing attempt at solving the problem he was discussing?)
IMHO it does solve the problem (modulo stupidities that I am prepared to have my nose rubbed in if I missed something) and was on topic.
If a solution to a problem that Guido presents as an obstacle pisses him off, I'd be surprised, and disappointed.
Make-the-hurting-stop-ly y'rs, I'm sorry you're hurting. That was not my intent ;-/
BTW, I never CC anyone unless they have asked me to. Unless gmane is doing it automatically, it shouldn't be happening.
Regards, Bengt Richter
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Let's just *keep* lambda
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Let's just *keep* lambda
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]