[Python-Dev] defaultdict and on_missing() (original) (raw)
Greg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Sat Feb 25 01:28:34 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] defaultdict and on_missing()
- Next message: [Python-Dev] defaultdict and on_missing()
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
Code that uses next() is more understandable, friendly, and readable without the walls of underscores.
There wouldn't be any walls of underscores, because
y = x.next()
would become
y = next(x)
The only time you would need to write underscores is when defining a next method. That would be no worse than defining an init or any other special method, and has the advantage that it clearly marks the method as being special.
-- Greg
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] defaultdict and on_missing()
- Next message: [Python-Dev] defaultdict and on_missing()
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]