[Python-Dev] Draft proposal: Implicit self in Python 3.0 (original) (raw)

Thomas Wouters thomas at xs4all.net
Sun Jan 8 13:25:28 CET 2006


On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 05:12:06PM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:

On 1/6/06, Kay Schluehr <kay.schluehr at gmx.net> wrote: > Then simply reject the PEP and the discussion can be stopped on > comp.lang.python too.

Only in the most severe cases does it make sense to create a PEP specifically to be rejected.

Yet if it isn't recorded, people will keep bringing it up. How about a 'rejected ideas' PEP for ideas that are right out no matter how people argue? A single PEP, with oneliners to describe ideas, one or two lines to explain 'why not', references to the python-list or python-dev discussions, if any, and a sign in big friendly letters saying "if you really must discuss these subjects, do it on python-list, not python-dev". Some of the stuff that could be in there:

etc. No need to come up with them all, I'm sure all the prize ideas will pop back up eventually ;)

-- Thomas Wouters <thomas at xs4all.net>

Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!



More information about the Python-Dev mailing list