[Python-Dev] Draft proposal: Implicit self in Python 3.0 (original) (raw)
Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve rwgk at yahoo.com
Sun Jan 8 16:54:34 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Rejected ideas PEP (was re: Draft proposal: Implicit self in Python 3.0)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Draft proposal: Implicit self in Python 3.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
--- Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
On 1/6/06, Armin Rigo <arigo at tunes.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 12:56:01AM +0300, Alexander Kozlovsky wrote: > > There are three different peculiarity in Python 2.x > > in respect of 'self' method argument: > > Yuk! This has been discussed again and again already. Please move > this discussion to comp.lang.python.
Yes please.
This is a death penalty, even without your explicit rejection. No professional person has the time to sift through that volume of noise.
This won't change.
The outside world is trying to tell you something; and they are not all dumb as you suggest in your other posting.
I suggest creating python-pep at python.org.
Cheers, Ralf
Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Rejected ideas PEP (was re: Draft proposal: Implicit self in Python 3.0)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Draft proposal: Implicit self in Python 3.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]