[Python-Dev] Draft proposal: Implicit self in Python 3.0 (original) (raw)
Tim Peters tim.peters at gmail.com
Mon Jan 9 01:59:43 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Draft proposal: Implicit self in Python 3.0
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Draft proposal: Implicit self in Python 3.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[Martin]
But now: who is going to write it? "Guido should write it" clearly won't work. And no, I'm explicitly not volunteering either.
[Thomas]
Well, the PEP will be mostly boilerplate anyway (unless there's a sudden influx of old ideas) so I'm sure I can whip something up before next weekend. I'll probably keep the actual list of rejected items to implicit self (which started the whole discussion), upgrading the Python parser beyond a simple LL(1), and maybe implicit ()'s for functioncalls, if I feel inspired. The exact wording, and additional rejects, can be discussed at length by those interested.
I'll help with this. That means I want to and intend to, and will discover that I can't actually make any time for it. With two of us putting it off indefinitely, it should get done in half the time ;-).
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Draft proposal: Implicit self in Python 3.0
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Draft proposal: Implicit self in Python 3.0
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]