[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r42116 - python/branches/release24-maint/Lib/unittest.py (original) (raw)
Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Fri Jan 20 21:50:16 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r42116 - python/branches/release24-maint/Lib/unittest.py
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r42116 - python/branches/release24-maint/Lib/unittest.py
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Right. This definitely is a feature, not a bug.
On 1/20/06, Thomas Wouters <thomas at xs4all.net> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 06:55:03PM +0100, georg.brandl wrote: > Author: georg.brandl > Date: Fri Jan 20 18:55:02 2006 > New Revision: 42116 > > Modified: > python/branches/release24-maint/Lib/unittest.py > Log: > Patch #1388073: Make unittest.TestCase easier to subclass
I don't believe this belongs in 2.4, since it can, actually, break code. Code that depends on the current situation, TestCase_attributename. Fragile code, to be sure, but still. If there were a compelling reason to backport, I guess it could be hacked to work right-ish, but subclassing TestCase in this way, while convenient, isn't important enough to warrant this (IMHO). -- Thomas Wouters <thomas at xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
-- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r42116 - python/branches/release24-maint/Lib/unittest.py
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r42116 - python/branches/release24-maint/Lib/unittest.py
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]