[Python-Dev] The path module PEP (original) (raw)

Ian Bicking ianb at colorstudy.com
Wed Jan 25 22:05:33 CET 2006


John J Lee wrote:

On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Ian Bicking wrote: [...]

Losing .open() would make it much harder for anyone wanting to write, say, a URI library that implements the Path API. [...] Why? Could you expand a bit? What's wrong with urlopen(filesystempathinstance) ?

My example shows this more clearly I think:

def read_config(path): text = path.open().read() ... do something ...

If I implement a URI object with an .open() method, then I can use it with this function, even though read_config() was written with file paths in mind. But without it that won't work:

def read_config(path): text = open(path).read() ...

-- Ian Bicking / ianb at colorstudy.com / http://blog.ianbicking.org



More information about the Python-Dev mailing list