[Python-Dev] DRAFT: python-dev Summary for 2006-01-01 through 2006-01-15 (original) (raw)
"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Sat Jan 28 00:50:16 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] DRAFT: python-dev Summary for 2006-01-01 through 2006-01-15
- Next message: [Python-Dev] DRAFT: python-dev Summary for 2006-01-01 through 2006-01-15
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Otherwise, not using the distributed aclocal.m4 may be possible, but it's a bad idea.
That may not be so bad, actually. It looks like libffi's aclocal.m4 is not hand-written, but generated through aclocal(1). Not sure why this is done, but this seems to be the cause of the explicit mentionings of the GPL (the snippets that aclocal.m4 is generated from are each GPL-licensed, make the whole aclocal.m4 GPL-licensed).
That said, I'm uncertain as to what the purpose of aclocal(1) is, so I might be wrong.
Regards, Martin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] DRAFT: python-dev Summary for 2006-01-01 through 2006-01-15
- Next message: [Python-Dev] DRAFT: python-dev Summary for 2006-01-01 through 2006-01-15
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]