[Python-Dev] Handling of sys.args (Re: User's complaints) (original) (raw)
Nick Maclaren nmm1 at cus.cam.ac.uk
Sat Jul 15 08:59:53 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] IDLE - firewall warning
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Handling of sys.args (Re: User's complaints)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Guido van Rossum" <guido at python.org> wrote:
OK, then I propose that we wait to see which things you end up having to provide to sandboxed code, rather than trying to analyze it to death in abstracto.
However, the ORIGINAL proposal in this thread (to split off argv[0] and/or make that and the arguments read-only) is entirely different. That is purely a matter of convenience, cleanliness of specification or whatever you call it. I can't imagine any good reason to separate argv[0] from argv[1:] by a sandbox (either way).
Regards, Nick Maclaren, University of Cambridge Computing Service, New Museums Site, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QH, England. Email: nmm1 at cam.ac.uk Tel.: +44 1223 334761 Fax: +44 1223 334679
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] IDLE - firewall warning
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Handling of sys.args (Re: User's complaints)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]