[Python-Dev] Bug in from future processing? (original) (raw)
Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Sun Mar 5 20:04:55 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Bug in from __future__ processing?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Bug in from __future__ processing?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 3/4/06, Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> wrote:
On Saturday 04 March 2006 15:34, Tim Peters wrote: > Indeed! But whose arm could we twist to get them to repair the > compiler in 2.4? I'd settle for a blurb in the next 2.4 NEWS just > noting that 2.5 will follow the documented syntax. That may even > be desirable, to avoid breaking working (albeit by accident) code > across a micro release.
I don't think a change like this should go into a 2.4.x release. It stands a very very high chance of breaking someone's code. I could be convinced about a warning being emitted about it, though I'm not going to have the time to figure out the new compiler to do the work.
In fact I know for sure it will break code -- I believe I first ran into this with Django.
Let's leave 2.4 alone (even adding a warning to 2.4.3 seems pointless) except for documenting this (not just in Misc/NEWS which is overwhelming but in the 2.4 docs for future-). In 2.5 it's already fixed; perhaps the 2.5 docs could mention that this was accidentally broken in 2.4.
-- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Bug in from __future__ processing?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Bug in from __future__ processing?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]