[Python-Dev] Let's stop eating exceptions in dict lookup (original) (raw)
Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettinger at verizon.net
Mon May 29 23:02:25 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Let's stop eating exceptions in dict lookup
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Let's stop eating exceptions in dict lookup
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 12:20:44PM -0700, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> I've finally come around to writing a patch that stops dict lookup from > eating all exceptions that occur during lookup, like rare bugs in user > eq() methods.
Is there a performance impact? I believe that this patch is good anyway, because I consider my (and anybody's) debugging hours worth more than a few seconds of a long-running process. You get really obscure bugs this way. I would also point out that this is the kind of feature that should not be traded off for performance, otherwise we'd loose much of the point of Python. IMHO. As it turns out, I measured only 0.5% performance loss in Pystone.
Please run some better benchmarks and do more extensive assessments on the performance impact.
The kind of obscure bug you're trying to kill does not affect 99.9% of Python users; however, loss of performance will affect everyone. This is arguably the most actively exercised part of the Python and should not be changed without carefully weighing purity vs practicality.
FWIW, I applied a similar patch to set objects in Py2.5 so that they wouldn't eat exceptions. So, I'm truly sympathetic to the cause. However, dicts are much more critical. There needs to be a careful judgement based on measurements and assessments of whether there are real benefits for everyday Python users.
Raymond
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Let's stop eating exceptions in dict lookup
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Let's stop eating exceptions in dict lookup
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]