[Python-Dev] Contributor agreements (was Re: DRAFT: python-dev summary for 2006-04-01 to 2006-04-15) (original) (raw)
Steven Bethard steven.bethard at gmail.com
Mon May 29 23:40:57 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Contributor agreements (was Re: DRAFT: python-dev summary for 2006-04-01 to 2006-04-15)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Contributor agreements (was Re: DRAFT: python-dev summary for 2006-04-01 to 2006-04-15)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 5/29/06, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
Terry Reedy wrote: >> .. contributor agreement: >> http://www.python.org/psf/contrib-form-python.html > > By itself, this link is inadequate since there is a blank for 'Initial > License' with no choices indicated. So the summary needs a link to an > instruction page also. The form is also a bit confusing since it appears > to talk about future contributions but the last line tacked on to the > bottom refers to the past. If it means both, then why not say so in the > main text in a way that non-lawyers can understand?
That's the modified version of the form for people like me that have contributed stuff before sending the form in (I have one sitting on my desk that will be going in the mail real soon now, honest. . .). There's another page somewhere in the PSF section that talks about contributor agreements in general - maybe that would be a better link for the summary?
Sounds like it. (That wasn't anywhere in the thread.) Does http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/ seem like the right page to link to?
Thanks,
STeVe
Grammar am for people who can't think for myself. --- Bucky Katt, Get Fuzzy
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Contributor agreements (was Re: DRAFT: python-dev summary for 2006-04-01 to 2006-04-15)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Contributor agreements (was Re: DRAFT: python-dev summary for 2006-04-01 to 2006-04-15)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]