[Python-Dev] Let's stop eating exceptions in dict lookup (original) (raw)
Tim Peters tim.peters at gmail.com
Tue May 30 06:36:32 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Let's stop eating exceptions in dict lookup
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Let's stop eating exceptions in dict lookup
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[Armin Rigo]
... ... Am I allowed to be grumpy here, and repeat that speed should not be used to justify bugs?
As a matter of fact, you are. OTOH, nobody at the sprint made that argument, so nobody actually feels shame on that count :-)
I apologize for the insufficiently reviewed exception-rework patch anyway. The massive try/raise/except slowdown in 2.5a2 (compared to 2.4.3) was depressing and surprising, and figuring it out & repairing it consumed various peoples' time across the whole week. By the time Saturday came around, I was fried enough that "well, people have hacked on this all week, the slowdown finally got replaced by a speedup, and all the tests pass -- enough already, let's go home!" ruled. So, as everyone suspected all along, it's Neal's fault for not running his refleak test more often ;-)
... It would have saved me two hours-long debugging sessions, and I consider myself an everyday Python user, so yes, I think so.
I'll try to review your patch carefully Tuesday, but I'm willing to accept a slowdown for this too (although from a quick look I doubt there's a measurable one, and your approach is wholly sane).
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Let's stop eating exceptions in dict lookup
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Let's stop eating exceptions in dict lookup
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]