[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r52692 - in python/trunk: Lib/mailbox.py Misc/NEWS (original) (raw)
Barry Warsaw barry at python.org
Thu Nov 9 16:07:23 CET 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r52692 - in python/trunk: Lib/mailbox.py Misc/NEWS
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r52692 - in python/trunk:Lib/mailbox.py Misc/NEWS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Nov 9, 2006, at 9:01 AM, A.M. Kuchling wrote:
Should I backport this change to 2.5.1? Con: The patch adds two new internal functions, syncflush() and syncclose(), so it's an internal API change. Pro: it's a patch that should reduce chances of data loss, which is important to people processing mailboxes.
Because it fixes a small chance of potential data loss and the new functions are prefixed with , my personal inclination would be to backport this change.
I agree. _ is a hint as to its non-publicness and I don't have a
problem in principle adding such methods. In this particular case,
it seems the patch improves reliability, so +1.
- -Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBRVNEL3EjvBPtnXfVAQIb0QP+Nmd6XPKQeeXaHrAG/fAFjrVHFn4SFkhH PtJqnLVOAQeSDonDdBQKluypGdWktcpGM/r1mz51cpJhxytYnAbwqeu1LyWJ/maX ABxG6zrkd7YCjZ5VyK2VQNs2dSLVWYYH24V/xwP5E5D2sEQ80sII3mnydSO+KLVI HBg9jztsc70= =Sj0Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r52692 - in python/trunk: Lib/mailbox.py Misc/NEWS
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r52692 - in python/trunk:Lib/mailbox.py Misc/NEWS
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]