[Python-Dev] New relative import issue (original) (raw)
Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Fri Sep 22 02🔞41 CEST 2006
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] New relative import issue
- Next message: [Python-Dev] New relative import issue
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I think it would be worth writing up a PEP to describe this, if it's to become a de-facto standard. That might be a better path towards standardization than just checking in the code... :-/
--Guido
On 9/21/06, Phillip J. Eby <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote:
At 12:07 PM 9/22/2006 +1200, Greg Ewing wrote: >Another thought on static module namespace configuration: >It would make things a lot easier for py2exe, py2app >and the like that have to figure out what packages >a program depends on without running the program.
Setuptools users already explicitly declare what projects their projects depend on; this is how easyinstall can then find and install those dependencies. So, there is at least one system already available for Python that manages this type of thing already, and my understanding is that the py2exe and py2app developers plan to support using this dependency information in the future.
-- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] New relative import issue
- Next message: [Python-Dev] New relative import issue
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]