[Python-Dev] minidom -> new-style classes? (original) (raw)
Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Wed Apr 18 16🔞42 CEST 2007
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] minidom -> new-style classes?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: Allow any mapping after ** in calls
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Great -- if you target 2.6, it'll automatically be merged into 3.0 the next time somebody runs svnmerge. (Thomas?)
--Guido
On 4/18/07, Jason Orendorff <jason.orendorff at gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/17/07, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > Perhaps a rewrite could target 3.0 and 2.6 could use a backported > version of this if py3k compatibility mode is enabled? I'd love to > see at least the 3.0 version cleaned up.
A lot of these bugs can be fixed without forking. I've been conservative so far. I looked at a diff this morning. Even pickled documents shouldn't break. If this patch lands, I can look at further cleanup after that. Thanks everyone, -j
-- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] minidom -> new-style classes?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposal: Allow any mapping after ** in calls
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]