[Python-Dev] Renaming Include/object.h (original) (raw)
Neal Norwitz nnorwitz at gmail.com
Thu Jan 4 08:26:01 CET 2007
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Renaming Include/object.h
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Private header files (Was: Renaming Include/object.h)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 1/3/07, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
Neal Norwitz schrieb: > Wow, I didn't realize I was that much of a broken record. :-) > I don't even remember talking to Thomas about it, only Guido. I > definitely would like to see all private header files clearly denoted > by their name or directory.
What is a private header file, and does Python have any? I can see why Modules/sre.h is "private": it won't get installed at all, so users can't include them. For everything in Include, I think users can, and will, include them directly, unless they get them through Python.h.
By private, I mean internal only to python and don't need to prefix their identifiers with Py and are subject to change without backwards compatibility. Include/graminit.h is one example of what I mean. Some others are: bitset.h, grammar.h, opcode.h, metagrammar.h, errcode.h
Others are kinda questionable (they have some things that are definitely public, others I'm not so sure about): code.h, parsetok.h, pyarena.h, longintrepr.h, osdefs.h, pgen.h, node.h
These are just some examples of what I mean. These may be in include because they are used between two top level directories, but not meant to be exported. There could be other reasons too.
n
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Renaming Include/object.h
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Private header files (Was: Renaming Include/object.h)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]