[Python-Dev] [Python-3000] dict.items as attributes [Was: The bytes type] (original) (raw)
Barry Warsaw barry at python.org
Tue Jan 16 23:47:18 CET 2007
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-3000] dict.items as attributes [Was: The bytes type]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-3000] dict.items as attributes [Was: The bytes type]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Jan 16, 2007, at 5:04 PM, Jim Jewett wrote:
Other than dict.items (and .keys and .values) returning a non-list, are there any other cases where the Py3K idiom can't already be used in (or at least backported to) Py 2.x?
I know Guido is against attribute syntax for dict.items and friends,
and I agree with him for reasons I can't quite put my finger on.
But, would it be possible to support both the py3k way and the Python
2 way if you accepted attribute syntax for returning the view
thingie? Couldn't that view thingie have an call that returned
the backward compatible list object?
- -Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBRa1V9nEjvBPtnXfVAQIODQQAlCI4iykl93zKJeIW/3QuuOm4jCRrhffV BOkuu+mM4N/1Rqc2TCBHUIi995TkYo/6Wuzb7LrXweG5kLm2cdWTNm+aSgZq35HL XxPVP9qwCElKbZjl84udx/dbLdl9AfVasT2iVUiEVZN3Kq5j+UbyK+oaQdVjBc+5 j51iDW+vhcc= =Qq7c -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-3000] dict.items as attributes [Was: The bytes type]
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-3000] dict.items as attributes [Was: The bytes type]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]