[Python-Dev] Fwd: Re: [Python-3000] Removing functions from the operator module (original) (raw)
Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Thu Mar 8 02:20:50 CET 2007
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Fwd: Re: [Python-3000] Removing functions from the operator module
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Fwd: Re: [Python-3000] Removing functions from the operator module
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
They do, by emphasizing the relationship with special methods.
On 3/7/07, Raymond Hettinger <python at rcn.com> wrote:
[Collin Winter] >> I don't suppose you've changed your mind about removing operator.truth >> and operator.abs in the seven months since this discussion?
[GvR] >No, though I think that operator.truth should be renamed to operator.bool. > >I like the idea that for each built-in op there's a callable in operator. It makes sense to me that built-in ops like + have a corresponding operator function like operator.add(), but I don't follow how this logic applies to abs() and bool(). ISTM, operator.bool and operator.abs would not add any value beyond what is already provided by builtin.bool and builtin.abs.
Raymond
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
-- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Fwd: Re: [Python-3000] Removing functions from the operator module
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Fwd: Re: [Python-3000] Removing functions from the operator module
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]