[Python-Dev] Policy Decisions, Judgment Calls, and Backwards Compatibility (was Re: splitext('.cshrc')) (original) (raw)
"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Fri Mar 9 09:02:01 CET 2007
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Policy Decisions, Judgment Calls, and Backwards Compatibility (was Re: splitext('.cshrc'))
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Policy Decisions, Judgment Calls, and Backwards Compatibility (was Re: splitext('.cshrc'))
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Grig Gheorghiu schrieb:
Titus and I are thinking about mentoring a Google Summer of Code project that would use the 'buildbot try' feature: set up a bunch of buildbot slaves and set them up so sending them a patch will trigger a checkout of the latest Python svn, followed by the application of the patch, followed by building and running unit tests for Python, followed by running test suites for various projects (similar to how it's being done in the community buildbot farm). This will hopefully give us a better grasp about how good a patch is, and will make the process of accepting patches more smooth.
What do people think?
Sounds great! It would be even better if it could automatically pull patches off the roundup tracker, try to apply them, and post a message into roundup whether the patch applied and tested successfully. To prevent spamming, it may be necessary to explicitly release patches to buildbot (i.e. classify attachments as non-patch, released, or verified), but that could be done later.
Regards, Martin
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Policy Decisions, Judgment Calls, and Backwards Compatibility (was Re: splitext('.cshrc'))
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Policy Decisions, Judgment Calls, and Backwards Compatibility (was Re: splitext('.cshrc'))
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]