[Python-Dev] Proposal to revert r54204 (splitext change) (original) (raw)
Greg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Thu Mar 15 06:19:39 CET 2007
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposal to revert r54204 (splitext change)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposal to revert r54204 (splitext change)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael Urman wrote:
Who would rather see os.path.dropext(path)?
I'd like to see such a function, and also maybe replaceext(path, new_ext). I often end up coding things like these myself, since indexing the result of splitext all the time is rather ugly.
To round off the set, I suggest
path.dropext(path) # returns the base name
path.getext(path) # returns the extension
path.replaceext(path, newext) # adds or replaces the extension
-- Greg
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Proposal to revert r54204 (splitext change)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Proposal to revert r54204 (splitext change)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]